PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDV vs. DIVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.90% return.


HIDV

1D
0.36%
1M
4.19%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.26%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*

DIVZ

1D
0.78%
1M
0.45%
YTD
3.90%
6M
4.40%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
11.35%14.64%26.01%22.21%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.90%16.72%18.44%5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and DIVZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between HIDV and DIVZ has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIDVDIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.10

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

5.18

+8.20

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIDVDIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.32

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.90

+0.73

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and DIVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDVDIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-15.42%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-5.83%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-9.52%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-3.76%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-3.49%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.36%

-0.17%

Volatility

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is 2.88%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that HIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDVDIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.41%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

7.05%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

9.31%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

12.65%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

12.57%

+1.94%

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than DIVZ's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.58%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.26%2.22%2.29%2.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to HIDV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 22.30% vs 15.48% for DIVZ. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 22.30% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.26% for HIDV.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.65% for DIVZ.

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDV and DIVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer