HIDV vs. DIVZ
HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIDV returned 20.71%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for DIVZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 5.36% return.
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 9.11% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 20.30% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 5.36% | 16.72% | 18.44% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDV and DIVZ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HIDV and DIVZ has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
HIDV
DIVZ
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIDV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.23 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | 5.26 | +5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -15.42% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -5.83% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -9.52% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.41% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -3.48% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.46% | -0.22% |
Volatility
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) at 3.29%. This indicates that HIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.29% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 7.28% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 9.48% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 12.63% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 12.56% | +2.00% |
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than DIVZ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.37% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIDV has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to DIVZ (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.
On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 20.71% vs 15.50% for DIVZ. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 20.71% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.37% for HIDV.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.65% for DIVZ.
HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIDV and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer