HIBS vs. ZIVB
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. HIBS is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HIBS
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 17.68%
- 6M
- -46.29%
- YTD
- -53.75%
- 1Y
- -71.13%
- 3Y*
- -56.50%
- 5Y*
- -54.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 1.63% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and ZIVB is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | 0.00% | -99.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | 0.00% | -99.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.20% | 0.00% | -93.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.41% | — | — |
Volatility
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.64% | 80.92% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.89% | 80.92% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.31% | 80.92% | +14.39% |
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 7.67% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 7.67%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer