HIBS vs. ZIVB
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. HIBS is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HIBS
- 1D
- -6.71%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- -64.03%
- 6M
- -61.26%
- 1Y
- -81.64%
- 3Y*
- -63.69%
- 5Y*
- -54.87%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -20.96% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and ZIVB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | 0.00% | -99.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | 0.00% | -99.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.14% | 0.00% | -93.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.79% | — | — |
Volatility
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.23% | 106.85% | -32.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.58% | 106.85% | -23.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.26% | 106.85% | -11.59% |
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 9.87% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and ZIVB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 9.87%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer