HIBS vs. ZIVB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. HIBS is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.

Performance

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HIBS

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -26.80%
• YTD: -59.26%
• 6M: -59.84%
• 1Y: -82.21%
• 3Y*: -63.10%
• 5Y*: -53.41%
• 10Y*: —

ZIVB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares	-7.46%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

HIBS vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBS

HIBS Risk / Return Rank: 0
HIBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HIBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIBS	ZIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIBS	ZIVB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.73	—	—

Drawdowns

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and ZIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBS	ZIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	0.00%	-99.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-83.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.98%	0.00%	-99.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.14%	0.00%	-93.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	54.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIBS	ZIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.45%	0.00%	+67.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.46%	0.00%	+82.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.78%	0.00%	+94.78%

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBS vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares	11.62%	8.42%	5.34%	6.49%	0.04%	0.00%	0.92%	0.13%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HIBS or ZIVB?

On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBS or ZIVB?

HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBS or ZIVB?

HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.

What is the main difference between HIBS and ZIVB?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.35% for ZIVB.