HIBS vs. SHRT
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. HIBS is passively managed, while SHRT is actively managed. Over the past year, HIBS returned -82.21% vs -21.62% for SHRT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
HIBS vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -59.26% return, which is significantly lower than SHRT's -17.15% return.
HIBS
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -26.80%
- YTD
- -59.26%
- 6M
- -59.84%
- 1Y
- -82.21%
- 3Y*
- -63.10%
- 5Y*
- -53.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- -17.15%
- 6M
- -15.15%
- 1Y
- -21.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -59.26% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -46.81% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.15% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and SHRT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HIBS and SHRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
SHRT
HIBS vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIBS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 0.74 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.95 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -2.06 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIBS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.22 | -1.66 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -0.79 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -25.98% | -74.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.13% | -22.73% | -60.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -25.70% | -74.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.14% | -8.15% | -84.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.63% | 10.49% | +44.14% |
Volatility
HIBS vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a higher volatility of 22.04% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.19%. This indicates that HIBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.04% | 4.19% | +17.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.82% | 10.94% | +41.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.45% | 13.04% | +54.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.46% | 12.77% | +69.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.78% | 12.77% | +82.01% |
HIBS vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than SHRT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 11.62% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and SHRT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBS has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to SHRT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs SHRT's -25.98%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -21.62% vs -82.21% for HIBS. On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -21.62% return vs -82.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.35% for SHRT.
HIBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.22 vs -1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer