HIBS vs. NVDU

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIBS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® High Beta Index, while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. HIBS is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, HIBS returned -79.46% vs 72.28% for NVDU. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.

Performance

HIBS vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -51.89% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 9.80% return.

HIBS

• 1D: 18.08%
• 1M: -7.51%
• YTD: -51.89%
• 6M: -51.65%
• 1Y: -79.46%
• 3Y*: -60.33%
• 5Y*: -51.83%
• 10Y*: —

NVDU

• 1D: -11.94%
• 1M: -4.03%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 13.04%
• 1Y: 72.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBS vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares	-51.89%	-72.44%	-26.60%	-33.13%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	9.80%	33.65%	289.29%	9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBS and NVDU is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	-0.54

The correlation between HIBS and NVDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIBS vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBS

HIBS Risk / Return Rank: 1
HIBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HIBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HIBS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 32
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBS vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIBS	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	1.05	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.60	1.69	-4.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.73	1.20	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	1.72	-2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	3.91	-5.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIBS vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBS and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIBS	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.14	1.05	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	1.06	-1.78

Drawdowns

HIBS vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and NVDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBS	NVDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-67.27%	-32.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.61%	-42.27%	-40.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.98%	-25.22%	-74.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.14%	-18.84%	-74.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	54.86%	18.56%	+36.30%

Volatility

HIBS vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a higher volatility of 27.81% compared to Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) at 26.09%. This indicates that HIBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIBS	NVDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.81%	26.09%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.37%	52.21%	+3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.99%	69.02%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.83%	91.26%	-8.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.03%	91.26%	+3.77%

HIBS vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBS vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than NVDU's 5.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares	9.84%	8.42%	5.34%	6.49%	0.04%	0.00%	0.92%	0.13%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	5.28%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBS and NVDU in my portfolio?

HIBS and NVDU have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIBS or NVDU?

HIBS has higher volatility (27.81%) compared to NVDU (26.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

Which ETF is better, HIBS or NVDU?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 72.28% vs -79.46% for HIBS. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDU has been the lower-risk option at 26.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIBS or NVDU?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 72.28% return vs -79.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBS or NVDU?

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBS or NVDU?

HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 9.84%, compared with 5.28% for NVDU.

What is the main difference between HIBS and NVDU?

HIBS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.04% for NVDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.