PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBL vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBL vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 95.37% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 18.85% return.


HIBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
31.17%
YTD
95.37%
6M
95.99%
1Y
276.75%
3Y*
62.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*

QQQE

1D
-0.22%
1M
9.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
17.59%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
95.37%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
18.85%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and QQQE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.81

The correlation between HIBL and QQQE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HIBL vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIBL
QQQE

Technology

45.8%
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.9%

Financial Services

12.5%
1.0%

Industrials

11.7%
10.1%

Basic Materials

4.6%
0.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
9.1%

Utilities

3.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.6%

Energy

2.2%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
7.7%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

HIBL
45.8%
QQQE
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HIBL
12.9%
QQQE
10.9%

Financial Services

HIBL
12.5%
QQQE
1.0%

Industrials

HIBL
11.7%
QQQE
10.1%

Basic Materials

HIBL
4.6%
QQQE
0.9%

Communication Services

HIBL
3.7%
QQQE
9.1%

Utilities

HIBL
3.2%
QQQE
3.9%

Healthcare

HIBL
2.9%
QQQE
8.6%

Energy

HIBL
2.2%
QQQE
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

HIBL
0.6%
QQQE
7.7%

Real Estate

HIBL

-

QQQE
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBL vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBLQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.34

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.88

3.00

+5.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.55

10.34

+22.21

HIBL vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 4.23, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBLQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23

2.00

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.51

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.76

-0.52

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBLQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-32.14%

-56.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-9.41%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

-21.38%

-48.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

-32.14%

-49.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-0.32%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.17%

-5.17%

-39.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

2.72%

+5.83%

Volatility

HIBL vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 21.02% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.82%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBLQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.02%

3.82%

+17.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.42%

10.61%

+39.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.96%

14.13%

+51.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.15%

20.29%

+61.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.87%

20.72%

+71.15%

HIBL vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBL vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QQQE's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBL and QQQE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to QQQE (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.47% vs 10.25% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.

HIBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.35% for QQQE.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBL and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer