HIBL vs. NVDU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. HIBL is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, HIBL returned 276.75% vs 90.38% for NVDU. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.

Performance

HIBL vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 95.37% return, which is significantly higher than NVDU's 24.68% return.

HIBL

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 31.17%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 6M: 95.99%
• 1Y: 276.75%
• 3Y*: 62.38%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

NVDU

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: 21.27%
• YTD: 24.68%
• 6M: 26.89%
• 1Y: 90.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	95.37%	60.38%	-0.40%	32.61%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	24.68%	33.65%	289.29%	9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and NVDU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.54

The correlation between HIBL and NVDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

HIBL vs. NVDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIBL	NVDU
Technology	45.8%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	-
Financial Services	12.5%	-
Industrials	11.7%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Healthcare	2.9%	-
Energy	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HIBL vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 89
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 38
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIBL	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.23	1.34	+2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	1.96	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.23	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.88	2.15	+6.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.55	4.90	+27.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIBL vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 4.23, which is higher than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIBL	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.23	1.34	+2.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	1.17	-0.93

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and NVDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBL	NVDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.27%	-67.27%	-21.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.39%	-42.27%	+10.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-15.08%	+12.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.17%	-18.83%	-25.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.55%	18.50%	-9.95%

Volatility

HIBL vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) is 21.02%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.76%. This indicates that HIBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIBL	NVDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.02%	24.76%	-3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.42%	50.62%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.96%	67.91%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.15%	91.02%	-8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.87%	91.02%	+0.85%

HIBL vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBL vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than NVDU's 4.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.18%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	4.65%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBL and NVDU in my portfolio?

HIBL and NVDU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIBL or NVDU?

NVDU has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to HIBL (21.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

Which ETF is better, HIBL or NVDU?

On 1-year performance, HIBL leads with 276.75% vs 90.38% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, HIBL has been the lower-risk option at 21.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIBL or NVDU?

Over the 1-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 276.75% return vs 90.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBL or NVDU?

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBL or NVDU?

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.18% for HIBL.

What is the main difference between HIBL and NVDU?

Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.04% for NVDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.