HIASX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

HIASX (Hartford Small Company HLS Fund) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HIASX returned 12.64%/yr vs 15.92%/yr for FGROX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HIASX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

HIASX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIASX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 32.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HIASX has underperformed FGROX with an annualized return of 12.64%, while FGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.

HIASX

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 6.30%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 17.70%
• 1Y: 34.47%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

FGROX

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 24.14%
• YTD: 32.27%
• 1Y: 62.54%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 15.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIASX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIASX Hartford Small Company HLS Fund	17.70%	12.95%	12.00%	16.74%	-31.56%	1.88%	55.51%	36.72%	-4.21%	26.36%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	32.27%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HIASX and FGROX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2008	0.95

The correlation between HIASX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIASX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIASX

HIASX Risk / Return Rank: 58
HIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
HIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
HIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
HIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIASX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIASX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.33	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.98	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	4.38	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.23	17.93	-8.69

HIASX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIASX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIASX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIASX drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than FGROX's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIASX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIASX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-41.48%	-26.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.84%	-14.36%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.87%	-28.61%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.94%	-38.52%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.36%	-41.48%	-0.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-4.35%	+3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.32%	-10.20%	-11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.49%	+0.03%

Volatility

HIASX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) is 5.98%, while Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that HIASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIASX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	9.22%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	20.77%	-6.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.93%	26.98%	-8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.23%	25.94%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.37%	25.27%	-1.90%

HIASX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIASX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIASX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

HIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FGROX's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	8.61%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%
HIASX Hartford Small Company HLS Fund	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	26.96%	13.78%	12.10%	20.73%	8.06%	0.00%	10.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIASX and FGROX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HIASX and FGROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HIASX or FGROX?

FGROX has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to HIASX (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIASX dropped -68.04% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.