HIABX vs. MDVAX
HIABX (Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund) and MDVAX (MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, HIABX returned 1.25%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for MDVAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIABX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for MDVAX.
Performance
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIABX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HIABX has underperformed MDVAX with an annualized return of 1.25%, while MDVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.15% annualized return.
HIABX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
MDVAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIABX Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund | 0.42% | 7.29% | 2.34% | 6.97% | -14.21% | -0.94% | 4.95% | 10.66% | -4.70% | 5.16% |
MDVAX MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund | 2.47% | 8.40% | 2.47% | 5.81% | -17.01% | 1.95% | 8.08% | 10.12% | -1.55% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIABX and MDVAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1999 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HIABX and MDVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIABX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank
HIABX
MDVAX
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIABX | MDVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.41 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 14.38 | -9.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIABX drawdown since its inception was -91.15%, which is greater than MDVAX's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIABX and MDVAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIABX | MDVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.15% | -23.02% | -68.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.21% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.53% | -5.44% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.40% | -23.02% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.48% | -23.02% | +1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -3.49% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.76% | -3.47% | -20.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.52% | +0.42% |
Volatility
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.74%. This indicates that HIABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIABX | MDVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 0.74% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 2.15% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 3.19% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 6.46% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 5.27% | +0.06% |
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIABX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIABX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison
HIABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIABX Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund | 5.56% | 5.59% | 3.71% | 3.42% | 4.63% | 5.14% | 0.23% | 3.96% | 0.37% | 3.00% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
MDVAX MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund | 3.99% | 3.91% | 2.45% | 4.87% | 3.76% | 4.06% | 7.20% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.64% | 2.11% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIABX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIABX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to MDVAX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIABX dropped -91.15% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.
MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIABX and MDVAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer