HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HHLE.TO) and iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO).
HHLE.TO and XHC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HHLE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022. XHC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011.
Performance
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHLE.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units | -9.04% | 11.85% | 3.28% | 7.14% | 5.96% |
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -4.13% | 10.91% | 1.22% | 2.14% | 4.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHLE.TO achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly lower than XHC.TO's -4.13% return.
HHLE.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -9.04%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- -4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHC.TO
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 1.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHLE.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XHC.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHLE.TO
XHC.TO
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HHLE.TO) and iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHLE.TO | XHC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 0.09 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 0.25 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.17 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 0.32 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHLE.TO | XHC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 0.09 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.69 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between HHLE.TO and XHC.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHLE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, more than XHC.TO's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHLE.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units | 12.36% | 12.01% | 11.76% | 10.81% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.95% | 1.87% | 4.42% | 2.38% | 0.84% | 0.79% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.68% | 1.14% | 1.63% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHLE.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum XHC.TO drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHLE.TO and XHC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHLE.TO | XHC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -27.28% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -9.85% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -8.30% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -4.80% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.29% | 5.22% | +2.07% |
Volatility
HHLE.TO vs. XHC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HHLE.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) at 4.89%. This indicates that HHLE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HHLE.TO | XHC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 4.89% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 10.44% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 17.41% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 13.69% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 15.72% | +0.50% |