HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO
HHLE.TO (Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units) and LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HHLE.TO returned 4.94%/yr vs 17.35%/yr for LONG.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHLE.TO achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than LONG.TO's 7.64% return.
HHLE.TO
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- -4.99%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LONG.TO
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHLE.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units | -4.99% | 11.91% | 3.32% | 7.18% | 6.08% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 7.64% | 6.19% | 25.86% | 19.50% | 7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHLE.TO and LONG.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHLE.TO
LONG.TO
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HHLE.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HHLE.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.46 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 5.21 | -3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHLE.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum LONG.TO drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHLE.TO and LONG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHLE.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.52% | -23.65% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -16.39% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | -22.45% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -1.91% | -7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -5.66% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 4.58% | +2.61% |
Volatility
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HHLE.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) have volatilities of 6.56% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHLE.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 6.73% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.22% | 13.94% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 16.87% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.38% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.72% | -0.96% |
Dividends
HHLE.TO vs. LONG.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHLE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%, while LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHLE.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units | 13.57% | 12.06% | 11.80% | 10.85% | 1.74% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHLE.TO and LONG.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI.
Find the right allocation for HHLE.TO and LONG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer