HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HHL.TO (Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF) and HCLN.TO (Harvest Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHL.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while HCLN.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HHL.TO returned 5.98%/yr vs -2.33%/yr for HCLN.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HCLN.TO.

Performance

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Clean Energy ETF (HCLN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than HCLN.TO's 23.34% return.

HHL.TO

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: -5.63%
• 6M: -4.89%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 6.75%

HCLN.TO

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 23.34%
• 6M: 19.08%
• 1Y: 60.05%
• 3Y*: 2.01%
• 5Y*: -2.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF	-5.63%	10.47%	3.87%	6.74%	1.28%	20.85%
HCLN.TO Harvest Clean Energy ETF	23.34%	29.60%	-20.55%	-22.13%	-15.59%	-25.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HHL.TO and HCLN.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021	0.24

The correlation between HHL.TO and HCLN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HHL.TO	HCLN.TO
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.6%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	24.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	23.6%
Utilities	-	48.6%

Return for Risk

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHL.TO

HHL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 16
HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HHL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HHL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HHL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
HHL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

HCLN.TO

HCLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
HCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HCLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
HCLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HCLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HCLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Clean Energy ETF (HCLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HHL.TO	HCLN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	2.32	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	3.06	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.40	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	4.70	-4.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	12.79	-11.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the HCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHL.TO and HCLN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HHL.TO	HCLN.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	2.32	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	-0.09	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	-0.32	+0.67

Drawdowns

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum HCLN.TO drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and HCLN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HHL.TO	HCLN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.70%	-69.23%	+42.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	-12.85%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	-45.98%	+29.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.01%	-62.53%	+46.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.71%	-40.75%	+32.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-45.85%	+39.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.21%	4.71%	+0.50%

Volatility

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) is 6.14%, while Harvest Clean Energy ETF (HCLN.TO) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that HHL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HHL.TO	HCLN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	9.25%	-3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	18.49%	-8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	26.05%	-11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.16%	25.05%	-10.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.81%	26.10%	-10.29%

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HCLN.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HHL.TO vs. HCLN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.34%, while HCLN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCLN.TO Harvest Clean Energy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF	10.34%	9.36%	9.27%	8.71%	8.51%	7.91%	9.02%	8.65%	9.00%	8.45%	8.83%	8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HHL.TO and HCLN.TO in my portfolio?

HHL.TO and HCLN.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HHL.TO or HCLN.TO?

On fees, HCLN.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HHL.TO or HCLN.TO?

HCLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HHL.TO.

What is the main difference between HHL.TO and HCLN.TO?

HHL.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HCLN.TO is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HHL.TO and 0.40% for HCLN.TO.