HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) and QQQQ.TO (Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while QQQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. HHIS.TO is actively managed, while QQQQ.TO is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHIS.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QQQQ.TO.

Performance

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQQQ.TO's 21.51% return.

HHIS.TO

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 7.52%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 4.61%
• 1Y: 31.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQQ.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 13.62%
• YTD: 21.51%
• 6M: 18.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF	9.32%	5.45%
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	21.51%	7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HHIS.TO and QQQQ.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIS.TO

HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 32
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HHIS.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HHIS.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	2.87	-2.13

Drawdowns

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than QQQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and QQQQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HHIS.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.83%	-11.95%	-19.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	0.00%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-3.38%	-5.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HHIS.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.36%	17.07%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.78%	17.07%	+16.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.78%	17.07%	+16.71%

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HHIS.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.63%, more than QQQQ.TO's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF	26.63%	22.88%
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.09%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HHIS.TO and QQQQ.TO in my portfolio?

HHIS.TO and QQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HHIS.TO or QQQQ.TO?

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HHIS.TO or QQQQ.TO?

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.

What is the main difference between HHIS.TO and QQQQ.TO?

HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.