PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIS.TO achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than HBTE.NEO's 28.08% return.


HHIS.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
4.23%
6M
3.47%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBTE.NEO

1D
2.94%
1M
4.14%
YTD
28.08%
6M
14.49%
1Y
67.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.71

The correlation between HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HBTE.NEO
HBTE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHIS.TOHBTE.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.14

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

2.19

+0.50

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIS.TOHBTE.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-55.67%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-55.67%

+31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-24.58%

+17.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-21.15%

+12.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

28.79%

-18.93%

Volatility

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) is 8.04%, while Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) has a volatility of 18.57%. This indicates that HHIS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBTE.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIS.TOHBTE.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

18.57%

-10.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.09%

50.16%

-32.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

66.62%

-42.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.81%

66.35%

-32.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.81%

66.35%

-32.54%

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIS.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HBTE.NEO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHIS.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HHIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.93%, more than HBTE.NEO's 26.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

HHIS.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBTE.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HHIS.TO and 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIS.TO and HBTE.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer