PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIC.TO achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than HUTS.TO's 20.32% return.


HHIC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.03%
6M
13.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTS.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.35%
YTD
20.32%
6M
21.83%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF
12.03%16.60%
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
20.32%3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HHIC.TO and HUTS.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.07

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HHIC.TO
HUTS.TO

Energy

34.8%
35.1%

Financial Services

32.7%

-

Basic Materials

11.3%

-

Technology

11.0%

-

Communication Services

10.2%
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

41.3%

Energy

HHIC.TO
34.8%
HUTS.TO
35.1%

Financial Services

HHIC.TO
32.7%
HUTS.TO

-

Basic Materials

HHIC.TO
11.3%
HUTS.TO

-

Technology

HHIC.TO
11.0%
HUTS.TO

-

Communication Services

HHIC.TO
10.2%
HUTS.TO
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO

-

Healthcare

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO

-

Industrials

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO

-

Real Estate

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO

-

Utilities

HHIC.TO

-

HUTS.TO
41.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHIC.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HUTS.TO
HUTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHIC.TOHUTS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.00

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.30%, smaller than the maximum HUTS.TO drawdown of -30.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIC.TO and HUTS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIC.TOHUTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-30.57%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.73%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-9.99%

+8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIC.TOHUTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

9.58%

+7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.98%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.98%

+1.95%

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTS.TO's 2.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHIC.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than HUTS.TO's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF
11.06%4.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
5.43%6.45%7.45%7.83%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHIC.TO and HUTS.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.06% for HUTS.TO.

HHIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while HUTS.TO is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HHIC.TO and 2.06% for HUTS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIC.TO and HUTS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer