HHCZX vs. VMNIX
Compare and contrast key facts about NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX).
HHCZX is managed by Highland Funds. It was launched on May 4, 2008. VMNIX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Oct 19, 1998.
Performance
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | -7.03% | 6.52% | 7.22% | 5.44% | -5.49% | -17.31% | 22.24% | 11.36% | 12.72% | 8.76% |
VMNIX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 6.12% | 9.36% | 5.84% | 12.33% | 13.47% | 23.39% | -11.58% | -9.48% | 0.66% | -4.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than VMNIX's 6.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HHCZX having a 3.97% annualized return and VMNIX not far ahead at 4.06%.
HHCZX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -0.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 3.97%
VMNIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 16.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VMNIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HHCZX vs. VMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
HHCZX
VMNIX
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHCZX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.00 | 2.20 | -2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 3.25 | -3.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.40 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 3.37 | -3.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 9.61 | -9.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHCZX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.20 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 1.75 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between HHCZX and VMNIX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Dividend Comparison
HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 4.27% |
VMNIX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 3.37% | 3.59% | 5.67% | 5.15% | 0.78% | 0.20% | 0.86% | 3.23% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 0.45% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than VMNIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and VMNIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHCZX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -27.90% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.31% | -4.95% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -6.69% | -24.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | -24.95% | -7.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.41% | 0.00% | -18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.98% | -8.82% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 1.73% | +3.68% |
Volatility
HHCZX vs. VMNIX - Volatility Comparison
NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) at 1.54%. This indicates that HHCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HHCZX | VMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 1.54% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 5.73% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 7.59% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 7.19% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 6.35% | +10.02% |