HHCZX vs. LSEIX
HHCZX (NexPoint Event Driven Fund) and LSEIX (Persimmon Long/Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX returned 3.82%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for LSEIX. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HHCZX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for LSEIX.
Performance
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than LSEIX's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX has underperformed LSEIX with an annualized return of 3.82%, while LSEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.55% annualized return.
HHCZX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.21%
LSEIX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | -3.95% | 6.52% | 7.22% | 5.44% | -5.49% | -17.31% | 22.24% | 11.36% | 12.72% | 8.76% |
LSEIX Persimmon Long/Short Fund | 10.15% | 12.02% | 17.36% | 15.70% | -9.95% | 14.67% | 8.13% | 5.28% | -6.10% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHCZX and LSEIX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between HHCZX and LSEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHCZX vs. LSEIX — Risk / Return Rank
HHCZX
LSEIX
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HHCZX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 4.61 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 18.38 | -18.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than LSEIX's maximum drawdown of -19.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and LSEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHCZX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -19.92% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -3.90% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -13.63% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | -13.63% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | -19.92% | -12.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | 0.00% | -15.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -4.00% | -10.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.37% | 0.98% | +8.39% |
Volatility
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Volatility Comparison
NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) at 1.98%. This indicates that HHCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHCZX | LSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 1.98% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 5.69% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 8.77% | +8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.14% | 10.89% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 10.69% | +5.60% |
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEIX's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHCZX vs. LSEIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither HHCZX nor LSEIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 4.27% |
LSEIX Persimmon Long/Short Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.23% | 3.49% | 6.18% | 0.00% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHCZX and LSEIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HHCZX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to LSEIX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHCZX dropped -33.57% vs LSEIX's -19.92%.
LSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HHCZX and LSEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer