PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHCZX vs. CDAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -4.57% return, which is significantly lower than CDAZX's 9.26% return.


HHCZX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-4.57%
6M
-4.95%
1Y
-0.06%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
3.86%

CDAZX

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.28%
YTD
9.26%
6M
8.04%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HHCZX
NexPoint Event Driven Fund
-4.57%6.52%7.22%5.44%-5.49%-17.31%22.24%11.36%12.72%8.10%
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
9.26%19.20%19.75%3.90%1.31%20.14%-6.39%8.17%-12.03%10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HHCZX and CDAZX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHCZX vs. CDAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHCZX
HHCZX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HHCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HHCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CDAZX
CDAZX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CDAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CDAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHCZXCDAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.50

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

3.60

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

13.31

-13.30

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHCZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the CDAZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHCZX and CDAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than CDAZX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and CDAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHCZXCDAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-30.94%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-7.32%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-8.54%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-10.91%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.26%

-0.13%

-16.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-6.11%

-7.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

1.97%

+6.50%

Volatility

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) is 2.75%, while Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that HHCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHCZXCDAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

3.48%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.65%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

9.80%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

9.21%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

10.06%

+6.22%

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAZX's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

HHCZX vs. CDAZX - Dividend Comparison

HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CDAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
21.30%23.28%10.21%1.58%11.48%6.28%0.00%0.79%50.33%3.97%0.00%0.00%
HHCZX
NexPoint Event Driven Fund
0.00%0.00%0.56%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.06%0.00%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


HHCZX and CDAZX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDAZX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to HHCZX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHCZX dropped -33.57% vs CDAZX's -30.94%.

CDAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHCZX and CDAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer