HGV vs. NTRA
HGV (Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.) and NTRA (Natera, Inc.) are both stocks. HGV operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while NTRA operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, HGV returned 1.61%/yr vs 16.79%/yr for NTRA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HGV vs. NTRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGV achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than NTRA's -7.53% return.
HGV
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
NTRA
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 63.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 33.13%
HGV vs. NTRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGV Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. | 11.55% | 14.89% | -3.06% | 4.26% | -26.04% | 66.22% | -8.84% | 30.31% | -37.09% | 62.28% |
NTRA Natera, Inc. | -7.53% | 44.72% | 152.71% | 55.94% | -56.99% | -6.16% | 195.40% | 141.33% | 55.28% | -24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGV and NTRA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
HGV:
$2.78
NTRA:
-$1.64
HGV:
0.69
NTRA:
11.69
HGV:
$5.18B
NTRA:
$2.50B
HGV:
$2.25B
NTRA:
$1.63B
HGV:
$1.15B
NTRA:
-$294.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGV vs. NTRA — Risk / Return Rank
HGV
NTRA
HGV vs. NTRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (HGV) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGV | NTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 2.45 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGV | NTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.77 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.30 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.37 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
HGV vs. NTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGV drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, roughly equal to the maximum NTRA drawdown of -77.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGV and NTRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGV | NTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.74% | -77.74% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.48% | -28.20% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.62% | -39.94% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.18% | -77.74% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.24% | -16.73% | +7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -33.49% | +10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.68% | 13.19% | +0.49% |
Volatility
HGV vs. NTRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (HGV) is 12.63%, while Natera, Inc. (NTRA) has a volatility of 18.79%. This indicates that HGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGV | NTRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.63% | 18.79% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.02% | 34.34% | -6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.82% | 42.35% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.53% | 57.01% | -18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.65% | 60.93% | -18.28% |
Dividends
HGV vs. NTRA - Dividend Comparison
Neither HGV nor NTRA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HGV vs. NTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. and Natera, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HGV vs. NTRA - Profitability Comparison
HGV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.44M and revenue of 696.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.
HGV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NTRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported an operating income of -93.52M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.
HGV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. reported a net income of 66.00M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
NTRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a net income of -85.09M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in a net margin of -12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HGV and NTRA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTRA has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to HGV (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGV dropped -77.74% vs NTRA's -77.74%.
NTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HGV and NTRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer