HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO).

HGR.TO and HBIX.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HGR.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 23, 2017. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025.

Performance

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HGR.TO Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF	0.86%	-2.27%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-24.07%	-6.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGR.TO achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -24.07% return.

HGR.TO

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -5.10%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: -3.15%
• 3Y*: 2.52%
• 5Y*: -1.89%
• 10Y*: —

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: -24.07%
• 6M: -46.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGR.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.

HGR.TO

Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF

HBIX.NEO

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF

Return for Risk

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGR.TO

HGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6
HGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HGR.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HGR.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	-0.60	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between HGR.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, less than HBIX.NEO's 37.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HGR.TO Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF	10.53%	10.35%	9.32%	8.72%	8.30%	5.28%	6.22%	5.36%	6.19%	2.75%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	37.84%	20.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HGR.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGR.TO and HBIX.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGR.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.33%	-55.90%	+14.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.41%	-49.72%	+22.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-19.91%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HGR.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	52.86%	-38.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	52.86%	-36.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	52.86%	-34.46%