HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE
HGGA.DE (HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF) and VAGF.DE (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Global Bonds funds - HGGA.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted while VAGF.DE tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGGA.DE returned 0.90%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for VAGF.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HGGA.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAGF.DE.
Performance
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGGA.DE achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than VAGF.DE's -0.68% return.
HGGA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 0.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAGF.DE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.66%
- 10Y*
- —
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGGA.DE HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF | 1.31% | -4.17% | 5.69% | 0.16% | -1.86% |
VAGF.DE Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.68% | 3.23% | 0.82% | 4.53% | -13.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGGA.DE and VAGF.DE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2022 | 0.08 |
The correlation between HGGA.DE and VAGF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HGGA.DE
VAGF.DE
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGGA.DE | VAGF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.06 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.38 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 1.06 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGGA.DE | VAGF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.33 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.17 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.58%, smaller than the maximum VAGF.DE drawdown of -19.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGGA.DE and VAGF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGGA.DE | VAGF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -19.57% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -3.11% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.78% | -4.45% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -10.73% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -8.99% | +4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.13% | -0.11% |
Volatility
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) is 0.53%, while Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that HGGA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAGF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGGA.DE | VAGF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 1.55% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.98% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 3.63% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 4.90% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 4.71% | +0.27% |
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGGA.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HGGA.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HGGA.DE nor VAGF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HGGA.DE and VAGF.DE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAGF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAGF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HGGA.DE.
HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted, while VAGF.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HGGA.DE and 0.10% for VAGF.DE.
Find the right allocation for HGGA.DE and VAGF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer