PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGGA.DE achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZY.DE's 10.90% return.


HGGA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.31%
6M
0.88%
1Y
0.39%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
10Y*

H4ZY.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
1.31%-4.17%5.69%0.16%-4.96%
H4ZY.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.90%7.98%25.90%20.32%-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HGGA.DE and H4ZY.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGGA.DE
HGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZY.DE
H4ZY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGGA.DEH4ZY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

3.64

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

14.48

-14.31

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGGA.DE and H4ZY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGGA.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

2.15

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.12

-1.08

Drawdowns

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.58%, smaller than the maximum H4ZY.DE drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGGA.DE and H4ZY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGGA.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-21.94%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-6.55%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.78%

-21.94%

+15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-0.32%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-3.60%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.65%

-0.63%

Volatility

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) is 0.53%, while HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that HGGA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGGA.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

2.62%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

7.66%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

11.09%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

13.49%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

13.49%

-8.51%

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGGA.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZY.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HGGA.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HGGA.DE nor H4ZY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HGGA.DE and H4ZY.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZY.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZY.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

HGGA.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while H4ZY.DE is Global Equities. HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted, while H4ZY.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HGGA.DE and 0.15% for H4ZY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGGA.DE and H4ZY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer