PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSIX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class I (HFSIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSIX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 10.15% return.


HFSIX

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
7.19%
6M
10.25%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

TBGVX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.31%
YTD
10.15%
6M
11.72%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HFSIX
Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class I
7.19%43.05%6.42%23.53%-3.73%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
10.15%23.86%2.47%12.48%-2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSIX and TBGVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2022

0.77

The correlation between HFSIX and TBGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSIX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSIX
HFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class I (HFSIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSIXTBGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.92

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

6.16

+1.75

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSIX and TBGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSIXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.91

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.75

+0.38

Drawdowns

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSIX drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum TBGVX drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSIX and TBGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSIXTBGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-50.97%

+28.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-9.56%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.13%

-11.45%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-1.46%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-6.08%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.96%

+0.21%

Volatility

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class I (HFSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 2.67%. This indicates that HFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSIXTBGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.67%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

7.77%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.96%

9.60%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

11.11%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

12.67%

+3.37%

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSIX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

HFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than TBGVX's 11.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFSIX
Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class I
5.87%6.30%1.58%1.52%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
11.00%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSIX and TBGVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFSIX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to TBGVX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSIX dropped -22.64% vs TBGVX's -50.97%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSIX and TBGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer