PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSI vs. VMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSI vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSI achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 18.73% return.


HFSI

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.57%
YTD
1.08%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%

VMAX

1D
0.57%
1M
2.72%
6M
13.64%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.57M$12.84M$8.48M
$16.61K$9.61K$6.33K

HFSI vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
1.08%9.56%7.91%3.01%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
18.73%15.65%15.89%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSI and VMAX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSI vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VMAX
VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFSI vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFSIVMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

6.35

-4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

23.40

-17.44

HFSI vs. VMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the VMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSI and VMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFSI vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VMAX drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and VMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSIVMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-19.05%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-4.93%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-2.43%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.33%

-0.54%

Volatility

HFSI vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) is 0.91%, while Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that HFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSIVMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

2.51%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

8.30%

-5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

11.99%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

15.17%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

15.17%

-10.25%

HFSI vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSI vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison

HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than VMAX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.61%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
1.82%2.14%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSI and VMAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMAX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to HFSI (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSI dropped -19.34% vs VMAX's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 31.16% vs 4.70% for HFSI. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HFSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 31.16% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 1.82% for VMAX.

HFSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VMAX is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 0.29% for VMAX.

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSI and VMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer