PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSI vs. SHYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSI vs. SHYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HFSI having a 1.38% return and SHYG slightly higher at 1.44%.


HFSI

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.51%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
10Y*

SHYG

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
5.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSI vs. SHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
1.38%9.56%7.91%9.91%-12.60%-1.57%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.44%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSI and SHYG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.59

The correlation between HFSI and SHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSI vs. SHYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSI vs. SHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSISHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.73

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

16.23

-5.10

HFSI vs. SHYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the SHYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSI and SHYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSISHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.07

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.73

-0.18

Drawdowns

HFSI vs. SHYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SHYG drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and SHYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSISHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-19.26%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-1.75%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-4.53%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.24%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-1.44%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.40%

+0.36%

Volatility

HFSI vs. SHYG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) at 0.94%. This indicates that HFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSISHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.94%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

2.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

3.16%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.97%

5.73%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

6.42%

-1.45%

HFSI vs. SHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSI vs. SHYG - Dividend Comparison

HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than SHYG's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.54%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.02%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSI and SHYG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFSI has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to SHYG (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSI dropped -19.34% vs SHYG's -19.26%.

On 3-year performance, HFSI leads with 8.37% vs 8.12% for SHYG. On fees, SHYG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HFSI has performed better with a 8.37% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 5.54% for HFSI.

HFSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while SHYG is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 0.30% for SHYG.

HFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSI and SHYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer