HFSI vs. GHMS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) and GHMS (Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSI returned 8.47% vs 2.44% for GHMS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFSI charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GHMS.

Performance

HFSI vs. GHMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF (GHMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HFSI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 8.47%
• 3Y*: 8.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GHMS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSI vs. GHMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF	1.38%	9.56%	7.91%	5.76%
GHMS Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF	0.00%	5.52%	2.30%	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSI and GHMS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.32

Return for Risk

HFSI vs. GHMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSI

HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 68
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GHMS

GHMS Risk / Return Rank: 21
GHMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GHMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GHMS Omega Ratio Rank: 23
GHMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GHMS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSI vs. GHMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF (GHMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFSI	GHMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.63	+1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	1.00	+2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.15	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	1.14	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.13	1.67	+9.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFSI vs. GHMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the GHMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSI and GHMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFSI	GHMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	0.63	+1.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.93	-0.39

Drawdowns

HFSI vs. GHMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than GHMS's maximum drawdown of -4.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and GHMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFSI	GHMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-4.73%	-14.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.73%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-2.44%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-1.21%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	1.81%	-1.05%

Volatility

HFSI vs. GHMS - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF (GHMS) at 0.00%. This indicates that HFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFSI	GHMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	0.00%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	1.74%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	4.97%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.97%	5.36%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.97%	5.36%	-0.39%

HFSI vs. GHMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GHMS's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFSI vs. GHMS - Dividend Comparison

HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than GHMS's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHMS Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF	1.69%	1.69%	4.48%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF	5.54%	5.67%	6.51%	5.77%	4.87%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFSI and GHMS in my portfolio?

HFSI and GHMS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFSI or GHMS?

HFSI has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to GHMS (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSI dropped -19.34% vs GHMS's -4.73%.

Which ETF is better, HFSI or GHMS?

On 1-year performance, HFSI leads with 8.47% vs 2.44% for GHMS. On fees, HFSI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GHMS has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFSI or GHMS?

Over the 1-year period, HFSI has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFSI or GHMS?

HFSI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for GHMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFSI or GHMS?

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.69% for GHMS.

What is the main difference between HFSI and GHMS?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Goose Hollow. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 1.20% for GHMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.