PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFQTX vs. JANIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFQTX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than JANIX's 11.41% return.


HFQTX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.73%
YTD
12.62%
6M
14.83%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*

JANIX

1D
0.03%
1M
2.30%
YTD
11.41%
6M
11.11%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
12.62%29.80%7.08%10.40%-6.41%12.85%1.59%21.13%-15.74%7.75%
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
11.41%9.66%10.40%14.68%-23.65%6.76%28.56%28.42%-5.15%12.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HFQTX and JANIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.67

The correlation between HFQTX and JANIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFQTX vs. JANIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFQTX
HFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

JANIX
JANIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JANIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JANIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFQTXJANIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.43

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

10.00

-0.34

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFQTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the JANIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFQTX and JANIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFQTXJANIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.67

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.22

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFQTX drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, smaller than the maximum JANIX drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFQTX and JANIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFQTXJANIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.53%

-62.76%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-11.05%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-23.89%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-31.80%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.01%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-10.03%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.68%

+0.11%

Volatility

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) is 4.72%, while Janus Henderson Triton Fund (JANIX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that HFQTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFQTXJANIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

5.24%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

12.42%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

16.07%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

19.61%

-6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

20.59%

-5.71%

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFQTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JANIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFQTX vs. JANIX - Dividend Comparison

HFQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than JANIX's 10.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
6.10%6.80%8.18%8.08%8.26%7.10%7.47%6.99%7.85%5.06%0.00%0.00%
JANIX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund
10.08%11.23%7.57%7.15%6.24%20.40%4.12%4.26%7.50%5.08%2.74%7.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFQTX and JANIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANIX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to HFQTX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFQTX dropped -34.53% vs JANIX's -62.76%.

HFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFQTX and JANIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer