PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFMF vs. SOFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFMF vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFMF achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 1.45% return.


HFMF

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
7.67%
6M
8.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMF vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HFMF
Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF
7.67%6.34%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
1.45%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMF and SOFR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFMF vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMF

SOFR
SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMF vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HFMF vs. SOFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFMFSOFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

4.96

-3.97

Drawdowns

HFMF vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMF drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMF and SOFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFMFSOFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-0.41%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-0.14%

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-0.03%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

Volatility

HFMF vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFMFSOFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

0.84%

+15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

0.84%

+15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

0.84%

+15.95%

HFMF vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFMF vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

HFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than SOFR's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HFMF
Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF
2.76%2.97%0.00%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
3.95%4.22%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFMF and SOFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HFMF.

SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 2.76% for HFMF.

HFMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HFMF and 0.20% for SOFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFMF and SOFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer