HFMF vs. GOLY
HFMF (Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF) and GOLY (Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Unlimited, while GOLY is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Gold-Backed Bond Index. HFMF is actively managed, while GOLY is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFMF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GOLY.
Performance
HFMF vs. GOLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFMF achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than GOLY's -27.51% return.
HFMF
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLY
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -31.45%
- YTD
- -27.51%
- 1Y
- -11.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- —
HFMF vs. GOLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 4.98% | 6.34% |
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | -27.51% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFMF and GOLY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFMF vs. GOLY — Risk / Return Rank
HFMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GOLY
HFMF vs. GOLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFMF | GOLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFMF vs. GOLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFMF drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, smaller than the maximum GOLY drawdown of -37.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMF and GOLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFMF | GOLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -37.45% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -37.45% | +25.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -12.30% | +8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.05% | — |
Volatility
HFMF vs. GOLY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFMF | GOLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 34.00% | -17.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 22.70% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 22.46% | -6.33% |
HFMF vs. GOLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFMF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GOLY's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFMF vs. GOLY - Dividend Comparison
HFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than GOLY's 10.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | 10.15% | 7.22% | 3.85% | 2.94% | 2.57% | 1.11% |
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 2.83% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFMF and GOLY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOLY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOLY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HFMF.
GOLY has the higher dividend yield at 10.15%, compared with 2.83% for HFMF.
HFMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while GOLY is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Strategy Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HFMF and 0.79% for GOLY.
Find the right allocation for HFMF and GOLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer