PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFMDX vs. HMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFMDX achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than HMSIX's 15.74% return.


HFMDX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.02%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.16%
1Y
27.17%
3Y*
24.14%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
14.87%

HMSIX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
15.74%
6M
15.93%
1Y
16.31%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
18.37%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-22.38%
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
15.74%-0.49%36.21%23.75%29.15%36.58%-31.00%11.97%-20.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMDX and HMSIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.55

The correlation between HFMDX and HMSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFMDX vs. HMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HMSIX
HMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
HMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFMDXHMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.26

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

4.78

+1.86

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the HMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFMDX and HMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMDX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, smaller than the maximum HMSIX drawdown of -68.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMDX and HMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFMDXHMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-68.43%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-6.93%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.76%

-16.29%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-21.17%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-5.63%

+4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-12.19%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.26%

+0.53%

Volatility

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) at 5.45%. This indicates that HFMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFMDXHMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

5.45%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

11.67%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.08%

14.94%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

20.12%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.12%

29.32%

-4.20%

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HMSIX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFMDX vs. HMSIX - Dividend Comparison

HFMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than HMSIX's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.61%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
7.56%8.42%7.74%9.70%10.84%12.61%15.17%9.10%4.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFMDX and HMSIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFMDX has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to HMSIX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFMDX dropped -61.25% vs HMSIX's -68.43%.

HFMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFMDX and HMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer