PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFMDX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HFMDX having a 15.50% return and HFCVX slightly lower at 14.86%. Over the past 10 years, HFMDX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 13.94%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.


HFMDX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.23%
6M
6.78%
YTD
15.50%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
13.94%

HFCVX

1D
1.15%
1M
2.65%
6M
11.85%
YTD
14.86%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
15.50%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
14.86%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMDX and HFCVX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between HFMDX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFMDX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFMDXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

6.34

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

16.91

-11.02

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFMDX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMDX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMDX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFMDXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-65.75%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-3.77%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.76%

-11.32%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-16.81%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-39.39%

-16.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-0.27%

-5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-8.21%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

1.41%

+2.48%

Volatility

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 3.54%. This indicates that HFMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFMDXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

3.54%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

7.39%

+9.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

9.58%

+12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

13.26%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

16.35%

+8.76%

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFMDX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

HFMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than HFCVX's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.44%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.62%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFMDX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFMDX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to HFCVX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFMDX dropped -61.25% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFMDX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer