PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFLYX vs. CHIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) and Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFLYX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than CHIAX's 3.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HFLYX having a 4.31% annualized return and CHIAX not far ahead at 4.44%.


HFLYX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.59%
6M
1.43%
YTD
1.57%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
4.31%

CHIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.04%
6M
3.03%
YTD
3.03%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFLYX
Hartford Floating Rate Fund
1.57%4.79%6.50%9.79%-3.40%4.02%1.32%8.56%-0.62%4.94%
CHIAX
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund
3.03%4.25%6.85%11.03%-3.14%5.03%2.32%6.67%-0.22%4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HFLYX and CHIAX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2005

0.59

The correlation between HFLYX and CHIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFLYX vs. CHIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFLYX
HFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIAX
CHIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CHIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) and Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFLYXCHIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.31

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

7.06

-1.49

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFLYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the CHIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFLYX and CHIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFLYX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum CHIAX drawdown of -37.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFLYX and CHIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFLYXCHIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-37.29%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.95%

-2.02%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

-2.41%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

-5.99%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

-19.94%

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-2.03%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.66%

-0.02%

Volatility

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) is 0.74%, while Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that HFLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFLYXCHIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.45%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.24%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

2.78%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

2.82%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

3.60%

+0.49%

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFLYX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFLYX vs. CHIAX - Dividend Comparison

HFLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than CHIAX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIAX
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund
6.45%7.44%7.25%7.19%3.90%3.38%4.19%4.94%4.38%3.79%4.47%4.26%
HFLYX
Hartford Floating Rate Fund
7.70%7.23%6.68%7.20%5.18%3.22%3.68%4.68%6.17%4.23%4.34%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFLYX and CHIAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHIAX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to HFLYX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFLYX dropped -33.12% vs CHIAX's -37.29%.

CHIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFLYX and CHIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer