PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFHIX vs. EIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund (HFHIX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFHIX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HFHIX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.


HFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.77%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
4.61%

EIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFHIX
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund
0.86%7.69%6.61%9.35%-4.54%4.21%1.04%9.28%-0.31%5.62%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
0.69%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%0.28%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HFHIX and EIFAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between HFHIX and EIFAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFHIX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFHIX
HFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund (HFHIX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFHIXEIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.44

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

1.63

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

4.92

+6.00

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFHIX and EIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFHIXEIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.45

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

1.58

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

1.14

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Drawdowns

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFHIX and EIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFHIXEIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-40.28%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-2.29%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

-3.43%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.21%

-7.63%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.31%

-24.22%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-2.27%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.76%

-0.25%

Volatility

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund (HFHIX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.64%. This indicates that HFHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFHIXEIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.64%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

1.96%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

2.57%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

3.14%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

4.46%

-0.28%

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFHIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFHIX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

HFHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than EIFAX's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
7.61%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%
HFHIX
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.29%6.70%6.73%6.60%5.21%3.30%3.86%4.75%6.55%4.24%5.01%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFHIX and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFHIX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to EIFAX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFHIX dropped -23.31% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.

HFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFHIX and EIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer