HFEQ vs. YCS
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). HFEQ is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.
Performance
HFEQ vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HFEQ having a 9.98% return and YCS slightly lower at 9.78%.
HFEQ
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
HFEQ vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.35% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and YCS is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
HFEQ vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFEQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEQ and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -49.56% | +37.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | 0.00% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -19.88% | +17.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 16.96% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 21.10% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.96% | +2.94% |
HFEQ vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HFEQ and YCS have an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither HFEQ nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and YCS have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.00% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HFEQ and YCS have the same expense ratio: 1.00% per year.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
HFEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and ProShares.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer