HFEQ vs. KMLM
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. HFEQ is actively managed, while KMLM is passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFEQ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFEQ achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 5.59% return.
HFEQ
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- -1.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.35% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 5.59% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and KMLM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMLM
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFEQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEQ and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -27.47% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -17.67% | +13.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -12.76% | +10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 11.34% | +10.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 14.58% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 14.69% | +7.21% |
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEQ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
HFEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.76% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and KMLM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KMLM is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KMLM is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 4.76% for KMLM.
HFEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while KMLM is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HFEQ and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer