HFEQ vs. FAAR
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. HFEQ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFEQ achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.
HFEQ
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.35% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and FAAR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAAR
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFEQ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEQ and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -18.03% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -5.43% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -7.82% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 13.37% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 12.95% | +8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 11.53% | +10.37% |
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEQ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
HFEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and FAAR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAAR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 9.57% for FAAR.
HFEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HFEQ and 0.95% for FAAR.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer