PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCGX vs. HNRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Hennessy Energy Transition Fund (HNRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than HNRIX's 25.58% return.


HFCGX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.16%
YTD
14.84%
6M
16.17%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
12.75%

HNRIX

1D
1.58%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
25.58%
6M
25.42%
1Y
41.22%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
14.84%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-15.48%
HNRIX
Hennessy Energy Transition Fund
25.58%12.87%13.84%4.09%47.97%55.91%-25.63%6.05%-23.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and HNRIX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCGX and HNRIX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. HNRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HNRIX
HNRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HNRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HNRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Hennessy Energy Transition Fund (HNRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFCGXHNRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.36

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.07

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

5.10

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.63

13.19

-3.56

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the HNRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and HNRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFCGXHNRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.36

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.79

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.34

+0.05

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, smaller than the maximum HNRIX drawdown of -74.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and HNRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCGXHNRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-74.75%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-8.40%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-19.19%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-28.56%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.02%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-15.28%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.25%

-0.88%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) is 4.38%, while Hennessy Energy Transition Fund (HNRIX) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that HFCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCGXHNRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

6.45%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

13.90%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

18.55%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

26.52%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

34.80%

-8.99%

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than HNRIX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCGX vs. HNRIX - Dividend Comparison

HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HNRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%
HNRIX
Hennessy Energy Transition Fund
0.61%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.76%13.34%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCGX and HNRIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNRIX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to HFCGX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs HNRIX's -74.75%.

HNRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCGX and HNRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer