PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFAJX vs. CIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class A (HFAJX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAJX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 35.71% return.


HFAJX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.48%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIGIX

1D
3.08%
1M
6.28%
YTD
35.71%
6M
36.79%
1Y
51.70%
3Y*
24.90%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HFAJX
Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class A
6.62%42.66%6.49%7.41%
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
35.71%23.11%12.51%10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAJX and CIGIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.64

The correlation between HFAJX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFAJX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFAJX
HFAJX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HFAJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFAJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFAJX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HFAJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFAJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class A (HFAJX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFAJXCIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.21

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

11.54

-3.77

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAJX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAJX drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAJX and CIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFAJXCIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-64.46%

+50.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-15.88%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

0.00%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-15.27%

+12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

4.40%

-1.19%

Volatility

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class A (HFAJX) is 3.63%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 12.19%. This indicates that HFAJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFAJXCIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

12.19%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

22.20%

-10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

25.03%

-10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

21.58%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

20.23%

-6.08%

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAJX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFAJX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

HFAJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than CIGIX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
9.94%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
HFAJX
Hartford Schroders International Contrarian Value Fund Class A
5.59%5.96%1.57%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFAJX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to HFAJX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAJX dropped -14.16% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFAJX and CIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer