HFADX vs. JAGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX).
HFADX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003. JAGTX is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Information Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | -1.54% | 5.88% | 1.69% | 6.30% | -16.54% | -0.74% | 9.45% | 9.58% | 0.56% | 1.89% |
JAGTX Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund | -7.05% | 24.86% | 47.04% | 55.16% | -37.69% | 17.39% | 51.00% | 45.08% | 0.78% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFADX achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly higher than JAGTX's -7.05% return.
HFADX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
JAGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 29.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- 21.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFADX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than JAGTX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFADX vs. JAGTX — Risk / Return Rank
HFADX
JAGTX
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFADX | JAGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.15 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.72 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.79 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 6.06 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFADX | JAGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.15 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.49 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFADX and JAGTX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Dividend Comparison
HFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than JAGTX's 14.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | 3.50% | 3.75% | 2.94% | 2.40% | 8.93% | 1.47% | 4.47% | 3.62% | 5.05% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JAGTX Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund | 14.73% | 13.69% | 23.66% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 16.05% | 9.00% | 8.62% | 6.56% | 7.50% | 4.85% | 8.12% |
Drawdowns
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFADX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum JAGTX drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFADX and JAGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFADX | JAGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -84.57% | +63.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -15.95% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -46.52% | +25.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -12.56% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -40.07% | +33.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 4.70% | -4.17% |
Volatility
HFADX vs. JAGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) is 1.09%, while Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that HFADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFADX | JAGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 8.31% | -7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 16.28% | -14.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | 25.52% | -22.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 26.67% | -20.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 24.60% | -19.59% |