HEWJ vs. C300.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L).
HEWJ and C300.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEWJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2014. C300.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A 300 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. Both HEWJ and C300.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 9.72% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | 2.37% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 2.00% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than C300.L's 2.00% return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 23.14%
- 1Y
- 46.23%
- 3Y*
- 30.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
C300.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
C300.L
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEWJ | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.95 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.48 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.51 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 15.06 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEWJ | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.95 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and C300.L is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while C300.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.65% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum C300.L drawdown of -31.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and C300.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -31.77% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -11.35% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -4.34% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -14.62% | +7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.34% | +0.82% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) at 6.07%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 6.07% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 12.09% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 17.91% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 22.13% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 22.13% | -2.13% |