HEQQ vs. PBQQ
HEQQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by JPMorgan, while PBQQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past year, HEQQ returned 17.08% vs 20.98% for PBQQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQQ achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than PBQQ's 9.10% return.
HEQQ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.67% | 17.20% |
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 9.10% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQQ and PBQQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HEQQ and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQQ vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HEQQ
PBQQ
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQQ | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.59 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 4.47 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 21.36 | -12.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQQ | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.94 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.50 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQQ drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, smaller than the maximum PBQQ drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQQ and PBQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQQ | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -12.92% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -4.71% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.21% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -1.26% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.98% | +0.95% |
Volatility
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) at 1.07%. This indicates that HEQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQQ | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.07% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 5.51% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.14% | 7.18% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 11.88% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 11.88% | -0.99% |
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HEQQ and PBQQ have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
HEQQ vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison
HEQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% |
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQQ and PBQQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEQQ has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to PBQQ (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQQ dropped -7.64% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.
On 1-year performance, PBQQ leads with 20.98% vs 17.08% for HEQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PBQQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBQQ has performed better with a 20.98% return vs 17.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEQQ and PBQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
HEQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.
HEQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PBQQ is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PGIM.
PBQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQQ and PBQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer