PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELO vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HELO vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 3.39% return.


HELO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.59%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.92%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HELO vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HELO and XAPR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.81

The correlation between HELO and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HELO vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELO vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HELOXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.06

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

13.37

-11.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

70.60

-62.05

HELO vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HELO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HELO and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HELOXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

4.31

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

1.88

-0.24

Drawdowns

HELO vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HELOXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-6.18%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-0.66%

-5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.16%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-0.18%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.12%

+1.18%

Volatility

HELO vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is 0.70%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that HELO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HELOXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.75%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.99%

1.31%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

2.05%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

6.18%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

6.18%

+1.78%

HELO vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HELO vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.62%0.67%0.60%0.19%
XAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HELO and XAPR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELO dropped -10.89% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 11.08% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELO and 0.85% for XAPR.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HELO and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer