HELO vs. ISWN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) are both Options Trading funds. HELO is actively managed, while ISWN is passively managed. Over the past year, HELO returned 11.08% vs 13.27% for ISWN. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HELO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ISWN.

Performance

HELO vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 4.28% return.

HELO

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 11.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISWN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 13.27%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HELO vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.31%	7.82%	18.05%	6.30%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	4.28%	23.23%	-3.96%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HELO and ISWN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.53

The correlation between HELO and ISWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HELO vs. ISWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HELO	ISWN
Technology	39.8%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	7.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	4.5%
Financial Services	10.0%	1.6%
Healthcare	8.2%	10.6%
Industrials	6.0%	19.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	6.7%
Energy	3.3%	4.0%
Utilities	2.5%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	5.9%

Return for Risk

HELO vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 50
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 30
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELO vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HELO	ISWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.09	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.60	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.20	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.38	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.55	4.67	+3.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HELO vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HELO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HELO and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HELO	ISWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.09	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	0.01	+1.62

Drawdowns

HELO vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and ISWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HELO	ISWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-32.35%	+21.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-9.63%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-4.03%	+3.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-16.17%	+14.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	2.85%	-1.55%

Volatility

HELO vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is 0.70%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that HELO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HELO	ISWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	4.67%	-3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.99%	10.10%	-5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.21%	12.20%	-5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.96%	11.67%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.96%	11.57%	-3.61%

HELO vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HELO vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than ISWN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.82%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HELO and ISWN in my portfolio?

HELO and ISWN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HELO or ISWN?

ISWN has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELO dropped -10.89% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

Which ETF is better, HELO or ISWN?

On 1-year performance, ISWN leads with 13.27% vs 11.08% for HELO. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HELO or ISWN?

Over the 1-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HELO or ISWN?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HELO or ISWN?

ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.

What is the main difference between HELO and ISWN?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELO and 0.49% for ISWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HELO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.