HEGD vs. RFLR
HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) and RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. HEGD is passively managed, while RFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, HEGD returned 19.36% vs 28.89% for RFLR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEGD charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RFLR.
Performance
HEGD vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than RFLR's 9.14% return.
HEGD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
RFLR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEGD vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 7.52% | 12.95% | 2.29% |
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | 9.14% | 11.81% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEGD and RFLR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HEGD and RFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEGD vs. RFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEGD
RFLR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HEGD
RFLR
Financial Services
HEGD
RFLR
Communication Services
HEGD
RFLR
Consumer Cyclical
HEGD
RFLR
Healthcare
HEGD
RFLR
Industrials
HEGD
RFLR
Consumer Defensive
HEGD
RFLR
Energy
HEGD
RFLR
Utilities
HEGD
RFLR
Real Estate
HEGD
RFLR
Basic Materials
HEGD
RFLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEGD vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank
HEGD
RFLR
HEGD vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEGD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 2.37 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.39 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.42 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 4.91 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 17.34 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEGD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.37 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
HEGD vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum RFLR drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and RFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEGD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -15.48% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -5.79% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -3.85% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.64% | -0.54% |
Volatility
HEGD vs. RFLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) is 2.26%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that HEGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEGD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 3.58% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | 8.26% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.92% | 12.23% | -5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.40% | 12.18% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.35% | 12.18% | -2.83% |
HEGD vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEGD vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison
HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than RFLR's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.31% |
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEGD and RFLR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFLR has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to HEGD (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEGD dropped -14.56% vs RFLR's -15.48%.
On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 28.89% vs 19.36% for HEGD. On fees, HEGD is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 19.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEGD is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.
RFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.33% for HEGD.
They also come from different issuers: Swan and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.89% for RFLR.
HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEGD and RFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer