HEGD vs. MAGS
HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEGD is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Swan, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HEGD returned 13.77%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEGD charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
HEGD vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.
HEGD
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 15.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEGD vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 5.47% | 12.95% | 15.24% | 11.25% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEGD and MAGS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between HEGD and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEGD vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEGD
MAGS
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HEGD
MAGS
Financial Services
HEGD
MAGS
-
Communication Services
HEGD
MAGS
Consumer Cyclical
HEGD
MAGS
Healthcare
HEGD
MAGS
-
Industrials
HEGD
MAGS
-
Consumer Defensive
HEGD
MAGS
-
Energy
HEGD
MAGS
-
Utilities
HEGD
MAGS
-
Real Estate
HEGD
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
HEGD
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEGD vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
HEGD
MAGS
HEGD vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEGD | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 1.25 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 4.21 | +9.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEGD vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEGD | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -29.91% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -18.62% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | -29.91% | +21.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -8.50% | +6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -4.72% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 5.50% | -4.33% |
Volatility
HEGD vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) is 3.12%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that HEGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEGD | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 5.86% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.51% | 15.07% | -9.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.31% | 20.30% | -12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 25.97% | -16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 25.97% | -16.59% |
HEGD vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEGD vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than MAGS's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.31% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEGD and MAGS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to HEGD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEGD dropped -14.56% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 13.77% for HEGD. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.34% for HEGD.
HEGD is categorized as Equity Hedged, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Swan and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.29% for MAGS.
HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEGD and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer