HEFT vs. QALT
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for QALT.
Performance
HEFT vs. QALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than QALT's 7.15% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QALT
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $283.91K | $525.47K | $801.16K | |
| $670.75K | $485.66K | $308.26K |
HEFT vs. QALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 3.28% | 1.10% |
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 7.15% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and QALT is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. QALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. QALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than QALT's maximum drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and QALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | QALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -4.85% | -4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -0.62% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -1.22% | -2.57% |
Volatility
HEFT vs. QALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | QALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 48.83% | -36.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 48.83% | -36.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 48.83% | -36.17% |
HEFT vs. QALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QALT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFT vs. QALT - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QALT's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 6.02% | 5.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and QALT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.
QALT has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while QALT is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.80% for QALT.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and QALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer