HEFT vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

HEFT vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.

HEFT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEFT vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	7.91%	0.98%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-4.13%	19.25%

Correlation

The correlation between HEFT and GDMN is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

HEFT vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEFT vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEFT	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.80	+0.64

Drawdowns

HEFT vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEFT	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-52.82%	+43.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-37.06%	+34.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-18.89%	+15.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEFT	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	51.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	61.32%	-48.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.53%	47.59%	-35.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.53%	47.59%	-35.06%

HEFT vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEFT vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEFT and GDMN in my portfolio?

HEFT and GDMN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HEFT or GDMN?

On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEFT or GDMN?

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEFT or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.

What is the main difference between HEFT and GDMN?

HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.45% for GDMN.