HECO vs. MNRS

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Blockchain funds. HECO is actively managed, while MNRS is passively managed. Over the past year, HECO returned 94.72% vs 33.46% for MNRS. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HECO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

HECO vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 65.78% return, which is significantly higher than MNRS's 15.68% return.

HECO

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 56.02%
• YTD: 65.78%
• 1Y: 94.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 68.61%

MNRS

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: -10.50%
• 6M: 12.12%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 1Y: 33.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	$77.93K	$50.37K	$469.12K
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	$295.65K	$244.31K	$541.12K

HECO vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	65.78%	18.85%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	15.68%	14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HECO and MNRS is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.92

The correlation between HECO and MNRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HECO vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HECO

HECO Risk / Return Rank: 85
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 21
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HECO vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HECO	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	0.44	+1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	1.14	+1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.13	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	0.59	+3.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.48	1.08	+11.40

HECO vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HECO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HECO and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HECO vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum MNRS drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HECO	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-56.70%	+12.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.03%	-56.70%	+35.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-36.23%	+30.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-24.00%	+12.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.62%	31.06%	-23.44%

Volatility

HECO vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) is 17.83%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 28.14%. This indicates that HECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HECO	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.83%	28.14%	-10.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.75%	56.83%	-25.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.28%	75.67%	-35.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.27%	72.65%	-27.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.27%	72.65%	-27.38%

HECO vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HECO vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.61%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.47%	0.54%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HECO and MNRS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HECO and MNRS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HECO or MNRS?

MNRS has higher volatility (28.14%) compared to HECO (17.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HECO dropped -44.59% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

Which ETF is better, HECO or MNRS?

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 94.72% vs 33.46% for MNRS. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HECO has been the lower-risk option at 17.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HECO or MNRS?

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 94.72% return vs 33.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HECO or MNRS?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HECO or MNRS?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

What is the main difference between HECO and MNRS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.59% for MNRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.