HECO vs. HOLA
HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.
Performance
HECO vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 73.41% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 4.14% return.
HECO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 37.18%
- YTD
- 73.41%
- 6M
- 61.98%
- 1Y
- 145.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECO vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 73.41% | 17.37% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.14% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECO and HOLA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
HECO vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HECO
HOLA
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HECO
HOLA
Financial Services
HECO
HOLA
Industrials
HECO
HOLA
Basic Materials
HECO
HOLA
Communication Services
HECO
-
HOLA
Consumer Cyclical
HECO
-
HOLA
Consumer Defensive
HECO
-
HOLA
Energy
HECO
-
HOLA
Healthcare
HECO
-
HOLA
Real Estate
HECO
-
HOLA
Utilities
HECO
-
HOLA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECO vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank
HECO
HOLA
HECO vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HECO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.24 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HECO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 1.44 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
HECO vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and HOLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -6.99% | -37.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -1.69% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -1.45% | -10.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | — | — |
Volatility
HECO vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.30% | 9.52% | +27.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 9.52% | +35.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 9.52% | +35.46% |
HECO vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECO vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison
HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.90% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECO and HOLA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.
HECO is categorized as Blockchain, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.50% for HOLA.
Find the right allocation for HECO and HOLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer