HECA vs. XLI
HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HECA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. HECA is actively managed, while XLI is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HECA charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
HECA vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECA achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 16.79% return.
HECA
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
HECA vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | -1.37% | 12.83% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 16.79% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECA and XLI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECA vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
HECA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLI
HECA vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HECA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HECA vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECA drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECA and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -62.26% | +49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.52% | -0.87% | -10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -9.19% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
HECA vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECA | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 16.31% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 17.55% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 20.02% | -7.45% |
HECA vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECA vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
HECA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than XLI's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.05% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECA and XLI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for HECA.
HECA has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.14% for XLI.
HECA is categorized as Global Allocation, while XLI is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for HECA and 0.08% for XLI.
Find the right allocation for HECA and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer