PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LMAX.TO
Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF
-3.55%7.03%4.91%
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
-9.81%7.70%32.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMAX.TO achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly higher than FMAX.TO's -9.81% return.


LMAX.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
3.86%
1Y
-3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMAX.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-9.81%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAX.TO's 1.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMAX.TO
LMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAX.TO
FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMAX.TOFMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

-0.22

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.21

-0.16

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.98

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.27

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.32

-0.77

+0.44

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMAX.TO and FMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMAX.TOFMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.22

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.78

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between LMAX.TO and FMAX.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

LMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.91%, more than FMAX.TO's 11.57% yield.


TTM20252024
LMAX.TO
Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF
11.91%12.51%11.36%
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
11.57%11.03%9.19%

Drawdowns

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, smaller than the maximum FMAX.TO drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAX.TO and FMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LMAX.TOFMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-17.84%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-15.83%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-12.66%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-3.63%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

5.53%

+2.47%

Volatility

LMAX.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO) is 3.75%, while Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that LMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LMAX.TOFMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.78%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

11.99%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

19.32%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

16.31%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

16.31%

-2.63%